Course Overview. From its tips, this Robert Trent Jones Junior layout can stretch to around 7,300 yards for its par of 71, however it’s listed as 7,188 yards for this event with 3 Par-5s and 4 Par-3s alongside 11 Par-4s.
Trent Jones Junior courses are far more prevalent on the PGA Tour than this side of the Atlantic, however with water in play on a number of holes there’s a hint of Bro Hof Slott about some of the holes here, with that course being another RTJ2 design used at this level for the Nordea Masters between 2010 and 2013. This is much shorter though and certainly more parkland in style, so comparisons are tentative at best.
Measuring 577, 568 and 614 yards for the 3rd, 10th and 18th respectively, the Par-5s will all require a long, accurate drive to allow players to even think about having a crack at the greens. Five sub-400 yard Par-4s will possibly be more pivotal to the outcome of the tournament though, with risk-reward being the order of the day with the penalty for stray drives and approaches often a watery grave.

Course Winners: Ashun Wu, 2025: -14, 175/1.
Tournament Stats. Event data comes from the China Open events held at various venues over the years. As noted above, this year’s venue made its debut last year so previous results should be considered accordingly: Current Form | Event Form | First Round Leader | Combined Stats.
Predictor Model. Our published Predictor Model is available here. As always you can build your own model using the variables available.
Our brand new predictor model is running alongside, where you can build your own rankings in live time, using the variables listed on the left hand side.
Weather Forecast. The latest weather forecast for the Shanghai area is here.
Wet weather on Wednesday will linger into Thursday’s play, however from there conditions improve and temperatures recover to the mid-70s Fahrenheit by Sunday. Wind will be fairly light at 5-10mph throughout.
Tournament Trends & Key Factors. Stats from the top 3 last year give us some insight into the type of player that may be suited to this test:
- 1st: Ashun Wu (-14). 288 yards (43rd), 83.9% fairways (16th), 79.2% greens in regulation (5th), 86.7% scrambling (1st), 1.72 putts per GIR (23rd)
- 2nd: Jordan Smith (-13). 299 yards (10th), 83.9% fairways (16th), 81.9% greens in regulation (2nd), 53.8% scrambling (20th), 1.75 putts per GIR (38th)
- 3rd: Yannik Paul (-12). 286 yards (48th), 89.3% fairways (2nd), 72.2% greens in regulation (19th), 70% scrambling (4th), 1.65 putts per GIR (7th)
Driving Accuracy stats were strong for pretty much all of the field, with even the more flagrant players hitting close to 70% of fairways, making this very much a second-shot golf course. Maximising GIR and scrambling well when that wasn’t possible was the order of the day 12 months ago, with eventual winner Ashun Wu dropping shots on just 4 holes over the course of the week.
The Par 3s are tough here – the field shot a combined 470 over par for the short holes on the week – and the Par 5s aren’t gimmies by any stretch either, so maximising performance on the Par 4s is critical. The scoring breakdown of the leaders was as follows:
- 1st: Ashun Wu: Par 3: Even; Par 4: -10; Par 5: -4
- 2nd: Jordan Smith: Par 3: +1; Par 4: -5; Par 5: -9
- 3rd: Yannik Paul: Par 3: +2; Par 4: -13; Par 5: -1
Strokes Gained: From a Strokes Gained perspective, stats for the same top 3 finishers here last year were as follows:
- 1st: Ashun Wu: T: 9th; A: 29th; T2G: 5th; ATG: 1st; P: 28th
- 2nd: Jordan Smith: T: 17th; A: 16th; T2G: 9th; ATG: 23rd; P: 8th
- 3rd: Yannik Paul: T: 25th; A: 9th; T2G: 15th; ATG: 36th; P: 9th
Eventual winner Wu was Strokes Gained positive in every category as he plotted his way round this course 12 months, as were Smith and Paul, suggesting that a good all-round game is preferable to excelling in any specific category.
Key: T: SG Off the Tee; A; SG Approach; T2G: SG Tee to Green; ATG: SG Around the Green; P: SG Putting.
Incoming Form: Immediate form varies between the Volvo China Open winners since 2010, however each of them had recorded at least one top-10 finish in their previous 10 outings, with the exception of last year’s winner Ashun Wu. Wu though had shown some improvement on his previous outing, opening with rounds of 66/67 in Macau before finishing in a tie for 26th.
- 2025: Ashun Wu: 47/68/MC/64/49/20/68/34/46/MC/MC/26
- 2024: Adrian Otaegui: 18/MC/20/56/MC/MC/65/4/24/MC/26/30
- 2023: Sarit Suwannarut: 45/27/35/MC/MC/9/37/23/76/MC/WD/MC
- 2021: Jin Zhang: 10/42/51/13/29/57/43/12/57/45/6/MC
- 2020: Huilin Zhang: 2/18/WD/56/MC/4/1/MC/60/4/60/6
- 2019: Mikko Korhonen: 3/35/16/57/MC/38/44/31/18/MC/10/30
- 2018: Alexander Bjork: 52/17/2/MC/MC/6/MC/12/19/MC/39/3
- 2017: Alex Levy: 63/4/58/25/64/27/MC/57/49/4/34/8
- 2016: Haotong Li: MC/26/7/41/53/MC/MC/60/35/MC/57/MC
- 2015: Ashun Wu: 47/MC/MC/11/28/64/14/6/50/14/22/MC
- 2014: Alex Levy: MC/46/52/47/3/56/MC/67/42/MC/37/20
- 2013: Brett Rumford: 22/36/3/40/10/MC/MC/22/MC/12/71/MC/1
- 2012: Branden Grace: 9/14/1/1/MC/47/51/28/35/25/MC/40
- 2011: Nicolas Colsaerts: MC/MC/MC/8/MC/11/MC/28/5/57/MC/17
- 2010: YE Yang: 33/29/9/19/46/15/17/3/MC/30/31/8
Event Form. History in this event, regardless of the Tour on which it was being contested, is extremely varied with the positive event history of the likes of Alex Levy, Adrian Otaegui and Ashun Wu offset by many of the other winners:
- 2025: Ashun Wu: MC/57/MC/MC/MC/MC/50/1/60/24/7/5/35
- 2024: Adrian Otaegui: 19/MC/MC/2
- 2023: Sarit Suwannarut: Debut
- 2021: Jin Zhang: MC/MC/64/MC/MC/MC/MC/MC
- 2020: Huilin Zhang: MC/MC/MC/MC
- 2019: Mikko Korhonen: 47/MC/MC
- 2018: Alexander Bjork: MC
- 2017: Alex Levy: 1/3/28
- 2016: Haotong Li: MC/MC/MC/50/6
- 2015: Ashun Wu: MC/57/MC/MC/MC/MC/50
- 2014: Alex Levy: Debut
- 2013: Brett Rumford: 45/14/11/33/MC/22/29
- 2012: Branden Grace: 16
- 2011: Nicolas Colsaerts: 32/MC/8
- 2010: YE Yang: 43
Last year’s win for Ashun Wu could lead us down a certain path, and I do agree with the idea that this is a second shot golf course where maximising greens hit is of paramount importance, however pre-event rain may change the dynamic a little this year with more aggressive types able to take advantage of the short Par-4s and the three Par-5s.